Can entrepreneurship be taught?

27th August 2021

Can entrepreneurship be taught?  For decades some have argued that entrepreneurs are born, not made, and others have argued that even the most talented person won’t succeed without the knowledge and skills required for business. As with most nature/nurture debates, there is truth on both sides.

David McKenzie of the World Bank and Christopher Woodruff of Oxford University have for years provided some solid data on this question by tracking research findings. Their expert critique cuts through the confusing findings and myths, to establish what we know and still need to find out.

In the August issue of the useful newsletter, VoxDev publishes their latest review of research findings. They conclude that on average training is indeed associated with better outcomes for small businesses, something that a few years ago was very much in doubt.

Using statistical techniques to combine different studies they have been able to establish that training leads on average to an estimated 5.6% improvement in sales and 12.1% improvement in profits. For a firm earning US$100 a month, a 10% increase in profits would cover the average cost (US$177) of a training course within 18 months. As these numbers suggest, their focus is mostly on micro-enterprises – very small businesses comprising just the owner and maybe up to five employees.

But that is on average. Some training seems to have no effect at all, which could depend on the quality and nature of the training and the sophistication of the entrepreneurs, or on the research methodology. Most studies are too small to register improvements as statistically significant. Their meta-analysis combines many studies to reveal effects that are otherwise hidden.

Training has improved in recent years. A clearer idea has emerged about what business “practices” contribute to productivity and growth, an insight that we in AMI have found very helpful over several years in our work across Africa. McKenzie and Woodruff explain:

“In the case of small firms, these [practices] include separating household and business accounts, keeping basic records, monitoring inventory, offering discounts and promotions to attract customers, and budgeting and planning. As firms grow, it is also desirable to have human resource practices that reward good employees and improve or remove less productive employees; processes for quality control and basic lean manufacturing; and practices to set and communicate production targets and monitor performance towards these targets.”

Some research suggests that personal initiative training may be even more effective than business training, but subsequent findings are mixed on this. It may be that this is only effective with smaller firms. But it does support our anecdotal findings that “soft skills” are at least as important as “hard skills” in business success.

Some studies look at specific techniques or approaches like Kaizen, a method for continuous improvement. This is particularly applicable in manufacturing, an area that I think has been relatively neglected in business development initiatives.

McKenzie and Woodruff find that training for single-person micro-enterprises does not increase employment, suggesting that in the urgent need to create jobs, we should be concentrating on businesses that already employ some staff and therefore have the capacity to employ more.

Some of the training effects can actually be attributed to screening that results in more selective entry into programmes. That has been our experience too – it is important to select those candidates and businesses that have a realistic chance of success. While this may support the argument that entrepreneurs are born rather than made, it more probably reflects the influence of factors like education and experience.

This also raises the question of how to help those people create their own jobs who have not already enjoyed exposure to education and business experience. I don’t think this difficult challenge has yet been cracked.

Jonathan Cook is a counselling psychologist and chairman of the African Management Institute. He is also the host of AMI’s weekly Rise reflection series focused on supporting you in your business and your personal wellness.

This article was originally published on BusinessLive on 05 July 2021 and is republished with permission.

Related posts

Managers and owners have to cope with an epidemic of loneliness

Managers and owners have to cope with an epidemic of loneliness

The Covid pandemic and remote work have worsened the trend towards isolation. Loneliness has significant consequences for physical and mental health, as well as productivity. Discover the effects, recommendations, and steps managers can take to combat loneliness in the workplace.

The transition to CEO brings a new identity

The transition to CEO brings a new identity

The journey to becoming a CEO involves a profound shift in self-image and a change in attitudes and behaviors. This transition brings about a liminal experience, where the perception of oneself evolves. Executives often find that time becomes their scarcest asset, leading to a constant drive for productivity. However, it is crucial for CEOs to reserve time for personal reflection and the well-being of their company. The transition to CEO requires not only an initial identity change but also a later one that involves trusting and empowering the team. By aligning behaviors with the new identity, leaders can establish lasting changes. Moreover, it is important to have a sustainable underlying identity based on core values rather than external achievements or status.

Human Intelligence provides the best of power skills

Human Intelligence provides the best of power skills

As AI advances, businesses must prioritize soft skills such as emotional intelligence, creativity, and interpersonal effectiveness to stay ahead. By unlocking the power of human intelligence, businesses can thrive ethically, creatively, and successfully in a world where machines are taking over.

eskort mersin - eskort eskişehir